Monday, September 26, 2016

Experimental Archeology: Shooting an 8th to 3 century BC Skythian/Tagar style bronze thimble replica.

Experimental Archeology: Shooting an 8th to 3 century BC Skythian/Tagar style bronze thimble replica.



Sometimes archeology dishes us up with curious archery artefacts, like the Tagar culture archery thumb thimbles. 




Unfortunately presently I cannot put a more exact date to these findings. Such thimbles were found along the Yenisey river in the Minusinskaya kotlovina basin ,republic of Khakasia. Southern Siberia, and belong to the Tagar culture.  Tagar culture dates from 8th to 3rd century BC. The Minusinsk Depression is right around the corner of the Altai mountains, in which the 5th century BC Ukok ice princess was found, and where the Skythian Pazyryk culture flourished. The Tagars have been described by archaeologists as exhibiting pronounced Europoid features. They are believed to have belonged to the Scythian circle. The Tagar produced animal art motifs (Scythian art) very similar to the Scythians of southern European Russia. Perhaps the most striking feature of the culture are huge royal kurgans fenced by stone plaques, with four vertical stelae marking the corners.


So.. were Tagars Skythians? I am not an expert. Well at least materialwise  and culturewise they were very similar and closely related to their Pazyryk neighbours. 

If you look at the historial era and geographical area of these curious archery thimbles, my initial thought was that these curious bronze thimbles might be an intermediate between the old Chinese cylindrical thumb rings and the modern long lipped shaped thumb rings. If you attach the thible to a cylindrical thumb ring.. You get a (more) modern one. Long lipped thumb rings emerged for the first time outside China in Persia at the times of Alexander the Great.  Unfortunately history proves me wrong and that is not the case. The thumb ring from King of the State of Rui () from the Spring-Autumn Period (771--476 BC) in China displays remarkable modern features and is a historical contemporary of the Tagar thimbles.

Chinese Rui thumb ring.(courtesy by Justin Ma from http://www.cinnabarbow.com/marinerbows/jinxian/OriginalRuiRing1.jpg)



So, even if these curious thimbles might not have left their mark in the historical development of archery, but rather got extict like dinosaurs, still, it is an archery challenge to shoot a bronze  Tagar thumb thimble again for the first time in some 2500 years, and also solve the puzzle on how to mount them and how to use them.  So I contacted my friend and bronzesmith Radostin Kolchev from Bulgaria to make me a replica of a Tagar thumb thimble fit to my own thumb size.



The first experiments with the thimble showed what I already feared. You easily shoot the thimble off your thumb, It takes off with your arrow :)  so I had to look for ways to secure the thimble.

So I came up with this:  I could find no other practical purpose for the two groves on the top of the thimble but to thread a string through these groves and secure that string  to a wrist strap. In my rig I let the two strings cross at the inner side of the thumb, before I attach them to the wrist. This allows for the two strings to prevent the bowstring to slip over and behind the thimble.  










It works now. It doesn’t come off anymore and the thimble is good to shoot. You can bend the thumb, and the strings on the side of the thumb avoid the bowstring from slipping behind the thimble.

It does not perform exactly to my liking or to what I am used to. Personally I’d rather customize the shape of the thimble a bit, and add a ridge to the thimble on the inside of the thumb to avoid the string from slipping behind the thimble, (the string rigging to the wrist strap works, but some alterations to the thimble itself might even work more secure)  or apply a string grove to keep it in place during the draw- just like the antique Chinese thumb rings have- or even better: apply both like in the Rui thumb rings.  However,  the antique  8th to 3th century BC Tagar thimbles are what they are..without a ridge and a string grove. 

Only the small holes on the inside of the thimbles are a puzzle still to be solved. All of the excavated thimbles have such a small hole, so they must have been there for a reason. Still puzzling...

Just asking myself... Now, if i were to tread a string through this hole, and tie it off on top of it with a knot, would that knot have the same effect as a string grove? I challenge everybody to solve this riddle. What is that hole for ? And this is wat defenitely makes this kind of experimental archery archeology fun. Of course we will never know for sure if the applications and solutions we come up with to get these curious archery artifacts to work are historically correct- as we are lacking conclusive archeological evidence, but it has merit. As archers, and not as archeologists who just dig things out of the ground and date, categorize, and classify them and put them in a box of Museum depots afterwards, we shoot bows and know how to use these, we know what we like and what we don't like as we shoot our bows, and we might have a much better idea on what its original purpose and its method of employment of such an archery artifact was. 



Hope you enyoy! Cheers, Ataelus. 

Thanks to Zoran Pavlovic for translating the comments on the pictures from Russian into English, to Radostin Kolchev for making these replica's, and to Justin Ma for allowing me to use some of his pictures of the Chinese Rui thumb rings. 

Post scriptum: 
Experimental archeology is an ongoing process. As stated above with the rigging I devised the thimble was shootable, but I was not really pleased with its usability. The bronze surface is very smooth and off and on the bowstring kept slipping over the thimble onto the thumb itself during the draw. With the bowstring behind the thimble, that is of course the perfect position to shoot it off despite the rigging I devised, and such misfits turned out quite painful.  As an archer you want a reliable piece of working gear. 
Most friendly archers taking part in the `solve the purpose of the hole' mystery also agreed that the most plausible use of that hole would be to prevent the bowsgtring from slipping over the thimble by threading a piece of leather or a string through it. 

Now eventually I have settled for this option. 



I did strengthen the linen thread I used with some hide glue to improve its durability

Yep. tried it out this morning. With the rigging and the thread through the hole this Skytian/Tagar thumb thimble system is now fully functional, usable  and reliable, and in no way inferior to a thumb ring. 
Here is a video. 



Facit: Of course my experimental rigging and the backstop are hypothetical, but they stand to reason from the viewpoint of the practical archer. The rigging prevents the thimble from taking off together with your arrow, and the backstop through the hole prevents the slipping of the bowstring over the thimble, so you have both a reliable and usable thumb- draw archery system.

It is great fun shooting and toying with these curious archery artifacts from the past.

Hope you enjoy ! Ataelus.















Sunday, May 15, 2016

Shooting the Dutch Domestic Reed arrow. A video of the first shot first kill test.

Shooting the Dutch Domestic Reed arrow. A video of the first shot first kill test. 


I am sorry, I almost forgot to make a video on how the Domestic Dutch Reed Arrow actually flies and behaves before pulling the two surviving Mark III Phragmites arrows out of active duty and call it a day for this years testing.
After the carnage in last week in the endurance test, in which all of my five reed arrows perished, I was lucky to be able to patch two of the victims up again. This time did not mount  the target piles, but put on 5th century BC Bronze trilobal Skythian warhead replicas.


Now you can write lots and lots of pages on these reed arrows on your blog, but the most informative way is shoot a video of me shooting them, shot from the `over the shoulder' position, so that everybody can follow its trajectory towards the target.

It also had to be the ultimate test.. The one shot- one kill. - the litmus test in bowhunting proficiency..  So no preparation and no warming up shooting. String your bow, nock that reed arrow shoot and hit. If you miss.. that was it then..






Ok. not perfect in the kill zone, but first and only shot: one shot, one hit ! I am quite pleased with that performance from 20 meters. I am not a 3d ace or a proficient bowhunter.  




I think this aptly demonstrated that you CAN make reliable solid shooting arrows out of the stuff that grows around here everywhere in the low countries, and moreover, are stable and accurate enough to pull a one- shot one - hit out of the hat from 20 meters.    

  As for durability... "Pfff.. scratches behind ears". That will be the mission fro next year.. 




Monday, May 2, 2016

Dutch Domestic Reed arrows, an ongoing process of trial and error.


DUTCH DOMESTIC REED ARROWS, AN ONGOING PROCESS OF TRIAL AND ERROR





Pliny the elder , the 1st century ad Roman wrote in his Naturalis historia, book XVI something very interesting about reed, and more specific, reed used for arrows, for writing, for making flutes and for fowling and fishing.

CHAP. 65.—REEDS USED FOR ARROWS, AND FOR THE PURPOSE OF WRITING.

It is by the aid of the reed1 that the nations of the East decide their wars; fixing in it a barbed point, they inflict a wound from which the arrow cannot be withdrawn. By the addition of feathers they accelerate the flight of this instrument of death, and the weapon, if it breaks in the wound, furnishes the combatants with a weapon afresh. With these missiles the warriors darken the very rays of the sun.2 It is for this reason more particularly that they desire a clear and serene sky, and hold in abhorrence all windy and rainy weather, which has the effect of compelling them, in spite of themselves, to be at peace with one another.
If a person were carefully to enumerate the peoples of Æthiopia, Egypt, Arabia, India, Scythia, Bactria, and Sarmatia, together with all the numerous peoples of the East, and the vast realms of the Parthians, he would find that fully one-half of mankind throughout the whole world live under a dominion imposed by the agency of the arrow. It was their surpassing excellence in this arm that so ennobled the warriors of Crete, though in this respect, as well as in all others, Italy has gained the mastery; there being no reed in existence better adapted for making arrows than that found in the Rhenus, a river of the territory of Bononia: (the Reno river at Bologna Italy)  filled with a greater quantity of pith than any of the others, it is light, and easily cleaves the air, while at the same time it has sufficient weight to resist the action of the wind; an advantage that is not possessed in an equal degree by those employed among the Belgæ. These advantages, however, are possessed by the most approved kinds that are found in Crete, although those of India are preferred; in the opinion of some persons, however, these last are of a totally different nature, for by adding a point to them, the natives are able to use them as lances even. Indeed, we find that in India the reed grows to the thickness of a tree, a fact which is proved by the specimens which are everywhere to be seen in our temples. The Indians assure us that in this plant, too, there is the distinction of male and female; the body of the male being more compact, and that of the female of a larger size. In addition to this, if we can credit the fact, a single compartment between the joints is sufficiently large to answer the purposes of a boat.3 These reeds are found more particularly on the banks of the river Acesines.

Here we see the 1st century ad Roman scholar making a reference to the Bologna reed, the Cretan reed, reference even to bamboo from India, but there is also a reference made to Belgium reed- which according to the Old Roman also is suitable for making arrows, although inferior to the Bolgona Reed.

So, if the Old Roman says you can make arrows out of Belgium reed, why not give it a try then. In the low countries, there is reed in abundance, every channel, pond or lake is lined with it.  So take a knife, walk out of the door, and cut some reed stems, the longest and straightest ones that grow in the middle of the bush, and get going. .. 

As you can see it is really everywhere this reed stuff in the low countries. 

 The indigenous reed in the Netherlands is the species Phragmites australis.  It can grow up to 3 meters in hight, and it is very light, brittle and flimsy.  The stems I cut out of the pond  have a diametre of some 6mm on average, are of course hollow, and the thickness of the shaft material itself varies from approximately 1 to 1,5 mm at the bottom, to 0,5mm at the tip.
A piece of  Dutch domestic reed shaft of some 84 centimeters in length can bring only 9,7 grams on the scale. Compare that to a 5/16”pine shaft of the same length – the smallest diametre wooden shaft to be found on the market- : that will come down to 19 grams.. A  Dutch domestic reed shaft  is about half the weight of  the lightest wooden 5/16” shafts.

Comparison between dutch domestic reed and a 5/16" pine shaft. 
Weight of a Dutch Domestic Reed shaft 9.43 grams on 84 centimeters.5-16 pine makes 19 grams on that same length. 
6mm diametre and 1.1 mm thickness of the shaft material.


So with the parameters of Dutch domestic reed (6mm diametre, and only 1mm shaft material thickness at the bottom that will decline to 0,5mm further up the shaft) there you instantly can see the problem with making arrows out of them.  How to get a sufficiently strong arrow out of them that doesn’t explode, and has sufficient weight not to undershoot/ dry fire your bow ?

After some vigorous trial and error- quite some of the arrows exploded instantly on their maiden voyage- I found out four things to counter that, and keep it manageable and make them shootable..

A)     Use as much of the bottom part of the shaft as possible. Here you have 1 to 1,2mm on shaft material thickness.
B)      Make a short arrow. The shorter the arrow the stiffer. The longer, the wobblier and weaker  it gets.  Dutch domestic reed stems hav quite some length between the nodes, varying from 14 to 19 centimeters, so in most cases you only need three full length pieces of these to get a shaft of sufficient length.  You will have to allow for a bit of extra on the top and the bottom to fit in a wooden foreshaft and a nock piece.
C)      So you only have to allow for straightening and aligning four nodes . Three full length pieces and two half to 1/3 length pieces.  To get some weight on the arrow, I prefer a longer foreshaft, lodged deep into the reed shaft, and also a longer nock piece.  Before you know it you are even under the 5 grains per LBS rule of thumb- the undershooting barrier- with such hyperlight shafts.
D)     You need a very light arrowhead with a small diametre socket. I go to a max of 70 grains. The heavier the arrowhead, the more spine it will need, and more spine is simply something you cannot pry out of these  6mm domestic reed arrowshafts. So I go for ¼” flight piles to max 5/16 flight piles. – 40 to 65 grains.  Also my bronze Thermopylae replicas of 70 grains work well on a Dutch domestic reed arrow from the pond next door.  I might mount  some microflints in the future as well to find out how these will perform. I also did some experiments with a cold hammered iron nail. That worked as well, but proved less suitable to target and 3d shooting, as there is a fat chance to break the feeble reed shaft when you try to pull it out of the target (which of course it did) in the absence of longer wooden foreshaft..

Bronze trilobal thermopylae battlefield replica. 70 grains. 

Cold hammered iron nail directly into the reed shaft. 




Practical part: Building Dutch domestic reed arrows.



Step 1: straightening the reed arrowshaft.

This step took me some trial and error. The shafts are quite feeble and split easily, so you have to be careful where and when to apply pressure.  I straighten my shafts over the gas flame of my kitchen furnace, and straighthen ém down by hand, not using an arrow straighthening  tool.  With an arrow straightener it is quite easy to put too much pressure on a certain point, and when your shaft splits, it is wasted.  So I carefully do it by hand and by feel, applying as much gradual arcs and gradual bending as possible.  Also mind that reed heats up very quickly, so you only need to toast it quite lightly, rolling the shaft and distributing the heat.
Once you have the hang of it and the feel of what reed does, it is not that difficult to make a straight and shootable shaft.  The pieces of reed between the nodes are in most cases already straight, so you only have to align all of the nodes into a straight line to have a straight piece of reed.  You only need 4 straight nodes in line to get your shootable arrowshaft.
Compared to making a wooden arrowshaft the traditional way making a reed arrowshaft  involves surprisingly little work.

Step 2: cutting the reed arrowshaft to length.

More trial and error involved.  Me and a knife don’t go along in avoiding  splitting the arrowshaft when I cut them to length.  Nothing more frustrating than messing up a nicely and meticulously straigthened arrowshaft.  I don’t take risks anymore, so I decided to go for a tile saw, slowly grinding around the shaft to cut it in half.
Reed shaft with the tile saw.. Carefully grinding straight cuts without splitting the reed. 


Step 3: making a foreshaft. 

This is the part where recycling comes in handy. Broken wooden arrowshafts are perfectly fit for a new life as a foreshaft.  If you have broken 5/16” ones, these are a good match for a reed arrow. I always try to go for the maximum strength, so I make the insert as long as required to make a snug fit to the node.
Recycling does not stop there.  I glue them in with hide glue. So.. should you blow up or break your reed arrowshaft, put the foreshaft piece into water, and the glue dissolves and it comes loose, to fly another day on another reed shaft.  All of my reed shafts from the pond next door have the same 6mm diametre, so I don’t have to do much to refit them on another shaft.
Reed shaft and a broken arrow.

Reed shaft and the5/16"wooden  foreshaft with the insert cut to size and length
Titebond hide glue to glue the forshaft into place. 




Step 4: Making a tailpiece with a nock.


If you have a casualty with a nock intact, you just might want to recycle that into a tailpiece as well.- provided you din’t apply plastic nocks of course-   As my casualty rate of broken arrows is not that high, I settled for another method, recycling arrow building stuff.  I usually build bamboo arrows, and I have to cut these to length.  And these cutoff pieces  are 9mm in diametre, and these serve perfectly for making nocks on my domestic reed arrows.  Bamboo is hollow, so I make a peg to fit into the bamboo piece and into the reed shaft.  I glue the peg into the bamboo piece, and then I cut the nock into the bamboo piece with the glued in peg with a tile saw.. Simple and effective.
I also glue the nock piece in with hide glue, so I can recycle that as well once I put it into water.
I might go into bone nockpieces in the future.


Pieces of bamboo and a kebab stick used as a peg.
Bamboo with the peg piece glued in
Cut in the nock grove with the tile saw into the bamboo tip, and glued the tailpiece in. 



Step 4: The usual stuff. Glue on fletchings.  

Even these can come with a recycling aspect.  If you have a casualty with the fletchings intact. Break off the bottom of the broken arrow, and put it in the microwave. After a few rounds you will notice some wisps of smoke rising, and then they are done.. Take ém out and you can strip off the fletchings just like that.. Sand the glue off, and they are ready to fly another day.  Wife will probably not approve the misuse of kitchen equipment.. but it works..
Just until now I have just applied what I had in store, or in the recycle bin, and haven’t given any thought about the right size of the fletchings for optimum performance on a domestic reed arrow. 



Verdict:
Can you shoot this?

This is the third series, the mark III´s applying everything I have learned from the previeous mark I and mark II  failures. 


Yes you can! Of course these superlight and flimsy arrows are not fit for heavy bows and immense firepower, but I CAN shoot them from my 50lbs Kaya Korean bow.  And I can hit 10’s on the verge of bullseyes with them at target at 20 meters.  They even stood up to two hours of shooting into a heavy duty stramit board. 
Yup, that is really straight into the target from 20 meters with a Mark III Domestic Dutch Reed arrow. 

And light as they are, my mark III´ DDRAs´ are between 15 and 17 grams total weight...( 237 to 262 grains total weight ) they are tremendously fast.  I reached almost 190fps with them on a traditional bow.. and didn’t  even draw it to full length then.. that is quite impressive  ( and then of course then the DDR arrow exploded in my attempts to get it over 200 fps with a full draw). Shooting at 20 meters you hardly need any elevation. The arrows simply blasts through almost flat. But then, 262 grains on a 50lbs bow is really on the edge of dry fire, the 5lbs per grain ratio, and not to be recommended by most bowyers who will gladly recommed 10 grains per lb out of liability and warranty reasons.. . The 50lbs Kaya Nomad Korean bow I used for the tests doesnt ´seem to have the slightest problem with that 5lbs per grain  though.


Almost 190 FPS.. that is fast for an arrow from a traditional bow



So yeah.. this is something that is shootable and sturdy enough to last a few shots.

Unfortunately despite their massive launching speed they didn’t perform that equally brilliant on distance.  I could get them to 200 meters, but that was it.. This hyperlight fast arrow runs itself out of speed quite fast.  I think it has to do with air resistance.. the faster the object, the greater the air resistace, and the faster it runs out of speed. Of course the more erratic flight of an underspined arrow doesn’t help.  And there is hardly any mass and and hardly any  impetus behind the arrow to retain its speed.  So yes.. a tad heavier and stiffer arrows do substantially better at distance.

Still to me the domestic dutch reed arrow, cut from the pond next door,  is pretty much a shoot and forget arrow. It is quite feeble with 6mm diametre and 1mm thickness on the shaft fabric. Once it has a crack, it’s a goner, and will explode on the next shot with absolute certainty.. Nevertheless within its boundaries,  I managed to pry some shooting hours out of them, and could shoot them quite accurately.  You actually CAN fill the pot with these reed things from the pond next door.

3d squirrel nailed with precision from 25 meters with mark II Dutch Domestic Reed arrow.


The virtue of reed is that you can get it everywhere, and can make a massive amount of arrowshafts  out of it without too much fuss.  And they are also easy to recycle.. If you have the foreshaft and the tailpiece intact, it is easy to put on a new reed shaft.  
To my opinion this Dutch domestic next door reed is a bit too feeble for a more general purpose like battle or warfare, but if you might find a bit stronger reed with a larger diametre of say 9mm, and 1.2mm or more on material thickness, I think you are definitely into business with a reed arrow.  It just might be that I haven’t been able to find it here in the Netherlands, did not look for it in the right spots, and might do well to consult some experts  who know about reed– like thatch roofing experts , or botanists- where to find these goodies.  They  might be around here as well, or perhaps grow a bit bigger and sturdier  in warmer climates, like Italy.
It is an ongoing venture.  The mad Skyth  will keep you posted.

Some additional pics of my mark III Dutch Domestic Reed arrows. 



Foreshaft with a 5-16 65 grains modbod target pile mounted. I deliberately took a very long foreshaft to have a good grip on it when pulling it out of the target, so I wouldn´t snap the reed shaft. Works! You can keep the arrows whole this way and get some shooting hours out of them. I did cut the forshaft down a bit though, because the original effective draw length was 33` with the long foreshaft. It´s now down to a more modest 31 inch effective draw length.


Post scriptum: Putting the Dutch Domestic Reed arrows to the (endurance) test. 


Mad Skyth posing with the Kaya Nomad 50lbs and a Dutch domestic Reed arrow, applying a thumb draw.



So: You have made an arrow that flies and can hit a target from domestic reed, but what can you say about its operational reliability. There's no other way than to make a set of them, put them out on the range and see how they will fare in an afternoon of rigorous target archery.

Set of five Mark III Domestic Dutch Reed arrows. Three of them are more or less matched with 16 grams in weight and 28,5"effective draw length. There is a short one of 27" which had the foreshaft broken in test flight, but could still be mounted with an arrowhead. And there is a longer one of 32,5".. The first prototype of mij Mark III's.

First I did some testing in the 50 meters backyard on a 3d Squirrel from 20 meters with the small 27" arrow that weighs only 13,5 grams. That arrow was a bit warped, but nevertheless I found myself enjoying this litthe warrior, as I managed to nail the Squirrel quite a lot of times - even four times in a row- with this little peculiar hyperfast arrow.





That gave me some positive feeling, and I was eager to find out how all five of them would fare at the Archery Club on a Stramit Target board.

Result: All five of the Mark III Domestic Reed Arrows perished! 







Yep. .all of the five Dutch Domestic Reed Arrows are no more. .All of them perished in an epic operational endurance target battle Breda Archery this afternoon ..Rip my brave hyper light warriors. 

One of them exploded.

The other four of the arrows broke at the connection between the foreshaft and the reed shaft. 


Another lesson learned. .The reed arrow shafts are strong enough to propel the arrow towards its target at high speed. .but they flex too much when they are stopped dead on impact on a hard stramit target board at some 190 fps. They didnt break straight away. .but apparently this flexing and overbending on impact did fatal gradual damage. .

So after some 15 to 20 shots into the stramit they eventually all broke at the connection between the harder foreshaft and the more flexible reed tail of the arrows. ..

One exploded. .not in the first shot. .but after some 12 flights. . It may have had a flaw in the reed shaft that, after continuous stressing , eventually gave in. 

It was remarkable that after one hour of shooting I still had all of my five domestic reed arrows intact, and then suddenly in the second hour they all perished at an astomishing fast rate. 

So...It simply is not strong enough to provide a decent operational reliability. And that stramit target board might have been too hard. 


Although I was able to hit some 4 yellows with them at 20 meters, I wasn't able to get some consistent grouping out of them. Even my three more or less matched 28,5` arrows did show slightly different flight behaviour. (of course that also might be the flaw of the archer, I cannot rule that out ) 
Anyways, they did not last long enough to inspire confidence, get me to know them each,  and get them where I wanted them.
So.. despite the efforts and the progress I have made in this respect, my Dutch Domestic Reed arrows are still pretty much in the `shoot and forget` category. 


Currently out of decent Domestic Dutch Reed shafts again. I think I will leave the project here for a while, and first and formost concentrate on finding stronger reed. I don´t think I will be able to make much more progress on the 6mm diametre 1mm internal thickness stems I cut from the pond next door.
I´ll keep you posted on further progress. I will cut some new supplies in autumn.


New  career for two of the five Dutch Domestic Reed Arrows that I was alble to salvage from the endurance test carnage. 

 I managed to salvage two from the carnage last week in which all five of the domestic reed arrows perished in a target endurance test. They won't fly anymore but will end their career as Skythian display arrows. I mounted them with Skytian style bronze trilobal arrowheads. The one on the left is a Radostin Kolchev replica, (a Bulgarian Bronzesmith)  and the right hand side one has a Neil Burridge Thermopylae battlefield replica mounted.  Neil does superb work as a Bronzesmith, specialized in making bronze age swords. http://www.bronze-age-swords.com/ 

As you can see these light and small 70 grains bronze 5th century BC trilobal arrowheads make perfectly sense on a reed arrow.






Very light and very fast, some 15 grams total weight, but not really fit to shoot more than once because you will almost certainly bash the small socket diametre arrowheads off on inpact. (which i think was originally the intention- to keep the arrowhead lodged in the body of your target-)










Saturday, February 27, 2016

Training four different archery styles. It is not in the style but in the archer.

Training four different archery styles.

There is always that ongoing debate on the archery forums on the internet about which style of shooting is better, or why everybody else is doing it wrong, you are a moron or an idiot to shoot a bow like this.. etc. etc.
Ataelus is an inquisitive mind, and he happens to shoot not only one, but four different archery styles.

I shoot Asian Thumb style- hooking with the thumb - over the right hand side of the bow- the thumb knuckle-




I shoot Western longbow mediterranean- three fingers draw - over the left hand side of the bow- the index knuckle





I shoot Assyrian/ Sassanid- secudary release draw- over the right hand side of the bow- the thumb knuckle





I shoot Tribal hunter- Amazonian draw- secundary release draw- over the left hand side of the bow- the index finger of the bowhand grips the arrowshaft during the draw, and you let it slip off during the release of the bowstring.









Having four different archery styles in your archery repertoire , the two most dominant styles in the world: Western Mediterranean and Eastern Thumb style, and two historical correct ones that are very old but quite unknown in the civilized archery world: Assyrian Sassanid, and Tribal Hunter/Amazonian, that gives you the opportunity to compare. Does it really matter which style you shoot when you want to hit your target ? Are there superior and inferior archery styles, like so many fundamentalists and self proclaimed experts on archery forums on the internet and on facebook proclaim?
I do recall how archery fundamentalism and narrow mindedness showed its ugly head when Lars Andersen became viral with his stunningly fast and spectacular  saracen speedshooting technique video. I spent many nights debating and defending the man. Putting things into perspective, and patiently explaining to the Western style oriented vehement critics how things work in a different archery style. From the asian point of view, archerywise most of what Lars Andersen does makes perfectly sense to me, although one can have doubts about the historical pedigree of his style and his claims.

So here is my own little stick in the henhouse. The experiment.
Shoot four different archery styles in a row, and train on that archery routine, switching from right hand side to left hand side each shot with a different technique. First shot Thumb, second shot Western Mediterranean, third shot Assyrian and fourth shot Amazonian.
Every technique has its own peculiarities in aiming, and I discovered that I rely more on visual targetting with my western and Amazonian left hand side of the bow styles, and shoot more instinctive with my right hand side of the bow styles, the thumb draw and the Assyrian.

But does it all matter in accuracy? Is there any of my four archery styles superior or inferior?






The answer is NO! 
I hit the target with my first shot just as many times as with my fourth shot. I cannot find any substantial difference in accuracy. It simply is all in the Archer! 

Now let that put an end to all of this archery fundamentalism. 





 Post scriptum.
Of course every one of my four styles have their pro's and their con's. I can shoot every one of them to about 120lbs in draw weight, but my western mediterranean with the three fingers still hauls the biggest weights. That might be because I started out as a Western English Warbow archer, so that still feels the most comfortable. To me the eastern style right hand side of the bow draws are the most versatile when shooting in dynamic conditions, like shooting from horseback or running, ducking and skyrmishing.  However don't underestimate the Tribal hunter/Amazonian style in this respect. The roll-off index finger grip on the arrowshaft allows for stable shooting in dynamic conditions as well. I have seen a video of amazonian tribal hunting in which the hunter shoots an arrow at full sprint and brings down a deer. And Lajos Kassai incorporated that tribal roll-off into his own western style oriented horseback archery method as well. You can have doubts about the historical pedigree of his horseback archery method, but it is one that works- due to the old finger roll-off gadget from the tribal archery style. And if you like all of the benefits of shooting right hand side of the bow, but don't like using the thumb, but your your fingers to shoot, you might just like the Assyrian approach. And you can do all of the Ottoman style trickshots like the Jarmaki, shooting lying down or running,  and the Khatra technique just as well- but with your fingers. My Assyrian technique also allows for easier and faster speedloading compared to shooting with a thumb ring.  But the thumb ring allows for the shots with the highest arrowspeed because its release is snappier.  So to me it makes perfectly sense to use multiple archery styles...So why is everybody archerywise still almost exclusively in his own box.?  Must be a cultural thing I think...But wouldn't there have been archers in the past that took the same practical approach just like me ? Shoot the style that works best in the given conditions?  You can be so much more versatile when you have multiple styles up your sleeve. 

I use the Assyrian for the fastest shots in a row, The mediterranean for the heaviest shots, the Thumb for the longest shots, and the Amazonian when i want to aim more visual in wobbly conditions.